Online Safety Management System
LOGIN | SIGNUP
Call us now at 1 866 668 6402

What training do I need to satisfy Enform IGSO (General Safety Orientation)?

Posted 05-Jul-2012 by brian.nodwell  and filed under: Safety Awareness Training, What's New at SafetySync?, Workplace Orientation
We get this question all the time.  Since confusion is running rampant in the oil and gas industry as a result of Enform dropping IRP 16 in favor of what is now called GSO, I will take a few moments to explain my understanding of the new document.

The IGSO is now a "guideline", meaning that the Enform committee has chosen to leave it up to each employer to decide what hazards exist in their workplace, and which corresponding training is required.  This is nothing new... regulations in all provinces have always required employers to perform hazard assessments and to train workers according to the actual hazards in their workplace.  The IGSO document is now confirming that this is the case.

The IGSO guideline now refers to, and even points to government sources, such as the WorkSafe Saskatchewan Orientation Guide, which is where you will now find the checklists that were once in IRP 16.  There is no list of training topics in the Enform IGSO.  The fact that Enform lists the content of PST and CSTS in Appendix 4 does not mean those topics are the ones to be covered for every company's safety training program.  It is simply a tool to help you perform your gap analysis (i.e. "do we provide training on all the high-risk hazards in our workplace?").

Even the WorkSafe Saskatchewan checklist is open ended, such as "Any other industry-specific hazards not already covered" and "Anything else the worker must know".  In essence, what the regulations and now IGSO are saying is that companies must train on whatever is appropriate, not just the topics on a given list.  Essentially, it is up to safety and senior operations personnel to go through these and other list of training topics and turn on anything that might be a high-risk hazard at your company.  [And anything missing from awareness training should be added as a safe work procedure.]

Do not let Enform's incestuous mentioning of their own PST program fool you into thinking that PST satisfies IGSO or government regulations.  The document itself makes no such claim.  An off the shelf program like PST will likely miss certain hazards and leave your workers untrained for some hazards and your organization exposed to non-compliance.  The IGSO document even says so (although not so directly).  A customize training program, delivered in whatever format you like, is what will best satisfy IGSO.  Of course we believe an online training program, integrated with your OHSMS, will work best - simply because compliance is tracked and records are maintained automatically.

We here at SafetySync have been planning for this change for some time.  Our online Safety Management System is designed specifically to meet the regulatory requirements and the new IGSO guideline.  You can select which hazards apply to your operations, and even assign them only to positions that may be faced with those hazards.  Our system can pre-populate the courses and lessons according to the old IRP 16 / PST list of topics, but hopefully you now understand that they are simply recommendations that should be modified according to your company's unique needs.

Industry safety alerts are sadly repetitive - "no implementation of work procedures"

Posted 23-Dec-2010 by brian.nodwell  and filed under: Safe Work Procedures / JHA
Another safety alert went out this week from the industry safety association for the oil and gas industry in Canada informing its members of another fatality.

This particular case involved a worker being in the drum area of the draw works and getting caught up in the line when the lever control was accidentally engaged.  Every incident like this is due to a different set of circumstances, but the contributing factors are consistent.  There are almost always the following problems with the company's safety management system:
  • "No implementation of work procedures to control work activities"
  • "The procedures for conducting the work were insufficient to prevent the incident"
  • "Personnel on location did not recognize the dangers associated with the task"
What the investigators are trying to say is that employers should invest more time and effort in developing safe work procedures and communicating them to their employees.

Very rarely do customers sign up for SafetySync for the Safe Operating Procedure module, but it is the component that will likely have the most dramatic improvement to safety at the company.  This is especially true if you record videos of competent employees explaining what could go wrong with the task, and how to complete every step correctly.

Having safe work procedures and a system like SafetySync to deliver them to your workers will go a long way toward reducing the likelihood of an incident at your workplace.  Sign up today and roll out the procedures you have ASAP; the basic system we offer is absolutely free.

Printing an IRP 16 Certificate

Posted 08-Jul-2010 by brian.nodwell  and filed under: Corporate Safety Credentials, Safety Awareness Training, What's New at SafetySync?
For quite some time, the SAFETYSYNC safety management system has allowed employees and administrators to print a wallet card or wall certificate that lists all the courses which were covered in each employee's basic safety awareness training.

 

Our system now allows administrators at our oil and gas industry clients to include the crest which states that they are a member of the Enform IRP 16 Registry.  [Our software helps companies with compliance and preparing the self-declaration - but this is a topic for another blog post.]

After receiving your certificate from Enform, upload it to the "Documentation / Credentials" component choosing type "IRP 16 Registry (Basic Safety Awareness Training)".

This will automatically add the "Proud Member of the IRP 16 Registry" crest to the certificates when they print.  We recommend employees carry these cards when accessing most oil company sites (see list of producers supporting IRP 16).  These certificates are particularly important, now that Enform is no longer issuing hard hat stickers.
 

ISNetworld vs. Certificate of Recognition

Posted 19-Aug-2008 by brian.nodwell  and filed under: Policy Acknowledgement, Safety Management System
I attended an ISNetworldTM users group meeting this afternoon in Estevan, Saskatchewan, that was hosted by Enbridge Pipelines.  It was my first exposure to the conflict that is shaping up between ISNetworld and various industry associations in Canada, including Enform and a number of provincial Construction Safety Associations.

                               

I use the word "conflict" because it is not a battle that is being waged openly between the two sides.  Rather it a contest that has developed because both parties are attempting to occupy the same role: the organization that sets standards for safety management.  It would appear, at first glance anyway, that the clash came about entirely by accident...

Decades ago, the various industry organizations in Canada developed a set of standards for a Basic Safety Program and set audit criteria in order to achieve a safety "Certificate of Recognition".  Many contractors follow the Enform industry recommended practice (IRP 9) and have obtained their COR.

More recently, ISNetworld built an online database to share contractor and supplier safety information with "owner clients", which are essentially large companies that operate facilities and require the services of the contractors and suppliers.  The ISNetworld application has evolved, partly to satisfy customer requests, and partly to differentiate themselves from other contractor safety management databases, like Canada HSE Registry.  Their service model is essentially based on "pre-qualifying" contractors for the various owner clients.  In order to obtain efficiencies, it made sense to develop a single set of safety program criteria, or "protocols" (at least for each type of work).  Hence the conflict with the aforementioned "Basic Safety Program" standards.  ISNetworld also realized that for each owner-client to review every contractor's protocols would be prohibitively time consuming and expensive, so they now offer their "Review and Verification Service" or RAVSTM for short.  Although not identical, there are obvious overlaps between a COR audit and RAVS.

Three contractors complained loudly at the ISNetworldTM users group meeting about the redundancy between the two programs.  Many others in attendance nodded their heads in agreement.  They wondered why a Certificate of Recognition would not satisfy RAVS.  Hats off to the ISNetworld presenter, Catherine Kirkwood, who diffused the tension by pointing out that the Certificate of Recognition could be uploaded into the ISNetworld database, and that compliance with a Basic Safety Program would surely make compliance with RAVS that much easier.  ISNetworld may acknowledge and track Certificates of Recognition, but they have yet to provide exemptions for equivalent protocols accordingly.  Meanwhile, Enform seems intent on standing behind their IRP 9.  In fact, they are currently in the process of revamping "Basic Safety Program", and rebranding the enhanced requirements as "Health and Safety Management System".

Both organizations should be commended for their efforts.  They are both raising the bar for employee health and safety at thousands of contractor companies in Canada.  Perhaps some day, one of the two systems will emerge as the clear leader, with the trailer eventually forced to adopt the other's standards in the name of consistency and efficiency.  Meanwhile contractors scamble to satisfy both systems, which is a blessing for us here at SAFETYSYNC, because I am told our online safety management tools help ensure 100% compliance.

* SafetySync is in no way endorsed, sponsored, approved by, or otherwise affiliated with ISNetworldTM.
Terms and Conditions | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy © 2010 SafetySync Corporation. All rights reserved.